Come to think of it, they do, but 's vision on is so insular, it's hard for anyone else, even his bandmates, to come inside. Combined, 's self-pitying and the monotonous music give away that the band bashed out very quickly -- it's the sound of a band determined to deliver a sequel in a finite amount of time. This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's. Clearly, leader takes some pride in his ass and dick joke, since he repeatedly uses it to illustrate the one theme of the album, namely how nobody understands him, especially in 's year of success after 1999's. .
Catch: I can't remember where. If you have any questions please ask them at the. Now, undoubtedly, there are some fans that will empathize with , but the question is, will it really resonate with them? There's nothing else to the record. Just did another count, there's only 47. In addition to the , you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with. Can someone else look into it? It may have been on , but that's a long article and I don't want to read through it again.
It's just part of the midrange hum, like the drums and droning guitars. But they should consider this -- not one profanity is used sexually, it's all an expression of rage or slang. Please go to and edit it to include a. Fair use rationale for Image:Limp Bizkit Chocolate Starfish and the Hotdog Flavored Water. But it doesn't stop there, or with the sickly cover art, since hot dogs and chocolate starfishes become lyrical themes on the album. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on. I figure it's worth asking because this article is full of crap anyway.
I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under but there is no as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. After a while, the cursing isn't even noticeable, since it's so omnipresent it winds up signifying nothing. Previously, they had pent-up rage on their side, but here, the music sounds rote -- when it gets louder, it signifies nothing, it just gets louder -- and can see no farther than his past year. After all, everyone feels rage after being dumped by their significant other, but does everyone live in a world where they feel like they're attacked on all sides? With a title that's defiantly vulgar but, more revealingly, embarrassingly awkward. I'm not sure this section even makes sense: The vulgar inferences led people to mix up Limp Bizkit with fellow nineties rockers Third Eye Blind.
And how do they do that? The scatological meaning of is obvious to anyone who's graduated junior high, but it stumbles over its punch line, winding up as more bewildering than funny or offensive. Okay, now I'm getting pedantic. The mix-up was caused by the similarity when Third Eye Blind's lead singer, Stephen Jenkins, says the word 'bump' in 'Semi-Charmed Life,' sounding like the f-word. Is this a mistake or has the review score been changed since it was first linked to? If the band supported him with sheets of noise, terrifying guitars, monstrous rhythms, or even a hook every now and then, 's narcissism may have been palatable, but the group pretty much churns out the same colorless heavy plod for each song. If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Using one of the templates at is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. I seem to remember doing a count with a mate some years ago, and we seemed to find more than 48 uses of the word in the whole song.
Since have never relied on song or studiocraft, it shouldn't come as a surprise that neither is in evidence here, but the problem is they're fishing in a shallow pool. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .